Mondrian’s work has been a big influence on me, and my approach to art. When I first encountered his paintings, I was struck by how spare, flat, and organized they were. There wasn’t even any hint of a 3rd dimension there. No perspective was suggested, at all. And the surfaces were profoundly flat. No bumps, no drips, no textures, no gloss. They are utterly plain, matte surfaces.
Years later, when I was in art school, I read a book of documents of modern art. In it were the manifestoes of the Surrealists, the Futurists, the Dadaists, and all those other early 20th century adventurers. It included an article by Mondrian called “Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art.” He explained that artwork had to be in a perfect balance between the viewer’s desire to see pure beauty in the work, and the artist’s desire for self expression.
I found this idea of balance between the viewer and the artist very powerful, and it’s informed the work I’ve done since. Through my work I’ve always tried to express myself. But I’ve always tried to make work that would have strong visual interest for the viewer, as well. The viewer counts for a lot! The viewer completes the picture.
I first got interested in photography in middle school, in the 1970s. Some friends showed me there was a small darkroom at the school, and they showed me how to develop film, and how to make enlargements.
“Look, life is ridiculous. Nothing means anything, really, when you get right down to it. Besides, we’re all going to die. We all know all that. But, can’t we have a little fun along the way?”
When I first encountered Kandinsky, it was the German Expressionist style he worked in when he was part of the German Expressionist group Der Blaue Reiter.
Ed Ruscha’s paintings had a huge effect on me when I first saw them when I was in high school. They opened me up and made me realize art could be nearly anything. It could be funny. It could be sarcastic. It could be about ordinary daily life. It didn’t have to be all that …
Piet Mondrian
Mondrian’s work has been a big influence on me, and my approach to art. When I first encountered his paintings, I was struck by how spare, flat, and organized they were. There wasn’t even any hint of a 3rd dimension there. No perspective was suggested, at all. And the surfaces were profoundly flat. No bumps, no drips, no textures, no gloss. They are utterly plain, matte surfaces.
Years later, when I was in art school, I read a book of documents of modern art. In it were the manifestoes of the Surrealists, the Futurists, the Dadaists, and all those other early 20th century adventurers. It included an article by Mondrian called “Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art.” He explained that artwork had to be in a perfect balance between the viewer’s desire to see pure beauty in the work, and the artist’s desire for self expression.
I found this idea of balance between the viewer and the artist very powerful, and it’s informed the work I’ve done since. Through my work I’ve always tried to express myself. But I’ve always tried to make work that would have strong visual interest for the viewer, as well. The viewer counts for a lot! The viewer completes the picture.
Share this:
Like this:
Related
Related Posts
Ansel Adams
I first got interested in photography in middle school, in the 1970s. Some friends showed me there was a small darkroom at the school, and they showed me how to develop film, and how to make enlargements.
Share this:
Like this:
DADA
“Look, life is ridiculous. Nothing means anything, really, when you get right down to it. Besides, we’re all going to die. We all know all that. But, can’t we have a little fun along the way?”
Share this:
Like this:
Wassily Kandinsky
When I first encountered Kandinsky, it was the German Expressionist style he worked in when he was part of the German Expressionist group Der Blaue Reiter.
Share this:
Like this:
Ed Ruscha
Ed Ruscha’s paintings had a huge effect on me when I first saw them when I was in high school. They opened me up and made me realize art could be nearly anything. It could be funny. It could be sarcastic. It could be about ordinary daily life. It didn’t have to be all that …
Share this:
Like this: